Immigration
Home Up

 

Let me state once again what is my position on Immigration: 

 I AM PRO IMMIGRANTS, BUT I CANNOT BE PRO-IMMIGRATION !  

UNLESS IT IS TIGHTLY CONTROLLED.  NO EXCUSE THAT IT WOULD BE OFFENSIVE TO HAVE I.D. CARDS

 TIMES HAVE CHANGED!    FOR MANY MANY YEARS CHINA WAS A BACKWARD COUNTRY PRODUCING LITTLE, AND WITH FOOD SHORTAGES EVERY OTHER YEAR.  TODAY -THANKS TO WESTERN TECHNOLOGY- CHINA IS BECOMING ANOTHER TAIWAN, OR JAPAN.  BUT, A LOT BIGGER. TEN TIMES AS MUCH!

WITH 1,300 MILLION OF CHINESE (ALMOST 5 CHINESE FOR EVERY AMERICAN) MANUFACTURING THESE DAY ALL THAT WE USED TO MANUFACTURE 10 YEARS AGO, AND WITH AMERICAN OIL FIELDS PRACTICALLY DEPLETED, I THINK IT IS TIME TO PUT SOME GOOD CONTROLS IN OUR BORDERS.

INDIA WAS ANOTHER SLEEPING GIANT.  THEY NEVER PRODUCED MUCH FOR EXPORT.  ON THE CONTRARY FOR CENTURIES THEY SUFFERED TREMENDOUS FAMINES.

WITH 1,000 MILLION HINDUS (ALMOST 4 HINDUS FOR EVERY AMERICAN) THEY WOULD LIKE TO WRITE ALL THE SOFTWARE WE DO THESE DAYS. AND WOULD LIKE TO SEND US ALL THE ENGINEERS, DOCTORS AND TECHNICIANS WE MIGHT EVER NEED (WITH H-1B VISAS).  WELL, THE RULES OF THE GAME ARE CHANGING FAST, AND WE NEED TO KNOW WERE ALL THIS IS TAKING US, BEFORE WE EXTEND OUR GENEROSITY TO MORE ALIENS.

I HAVE NEVER BEEN MUCH OF A "PESSIMIST", ALTHOUGH BEING A "REALIST" BRINGS YOU PRETTY CLOSE TO THAT SOMETIMES.   I AM AFRAID THIS RECESSION -IN THE USA AND JAPAN (AND ON THE REST OF THE WORLD FOR THAT MATTER)- CAME TO STAY.  IT MIGHT BE WITH US UNTIL CHINA'S STANDARD-OF-LIVING REACHES CLOSER TO OURS.  THAT MIGHT TAKE A WHILE!    

P.S. -  We just bought in Wal-Mart a nice electric fan for $12 (Made in China, like everything else these days, of course). It would had cost three times as much a decade ago, and  salaries where lower.  It is nice to find a cornucopia of things that cheap.  The problem is, it is going to be progressively difficult to keep our factories open, and paying "American salaries".
I must admit that immigration is a difficult issue to analyze, and it brings up my emotions pretty high.

On one hand, some people are firm believers that immigration is always bad for a country, regardless of shortsighted appearances -they say.  They insist that it would be better to have nationals educated in the same school system, all under the same standards.  They bring up the benefits of having an homogeneous society, where all -or almost all- speak the same language, have the same idiosyncrasies, profess the same beliefs, and respect the same values. Immigrants would -typically- work harder and for less, but often their plight causes pain to those not used to see human misery in our shores.  Furthermore -they say- without cheap labor, industry would have to be more innovative, automating processes, and using sophisticated robotsJapanese for instance have historically held this view, and have been very reluctant to allow foreign workers.  Recently though, realizing they did not have enough youngsters to pay for Social Security of their elders, they started to allow thousands of Koreans and Brazilians to settle in their country, mostly in the city of Ota.

Carnival The city of Ota has 5% of Immigrants. A record in Japan.
On the other hand, you have the other group of opinionates, who say that -for one reason or another- immigration brings a lot of benefits.  Immigrants, many of whom never had an opportunity to have a job, work hard for the money.  They do it for less, and do not demand the benefits we are used to.  True they have -on the average- less formal education, but there are plenty of menial jobs where not much education is needed.  And many Americans despise those jobs anyway.  Think -for instance- about picking oranges 12 hours a day, for less than $2 an hour.  So, what basically they admit, is that immigration is good only because we take advantage of these immigrants.  Moreover, in modern societies families tend to have less children, and that puts in risk our social security benefits years from now.

Furthermore, on the average, immigrants have larger families, they arrive at the prime of their life when they are in good health and ready to work hard.  We did not have to spend a penny on their education, and most are not used to be dependent on social services.  Therefore, despite of their obvious needs for those services they go without them, sometimes oblivious to the fact that they would qualify for them.  But -more often than not- being illegal, plus the language barrier, plus their ignorance about their rights, they are unfairly classified as non-beneficiaries for those services.  Statistically, they are not as costly to our Welfare system as many other poverty national groups are.

I grew up in the NW part of Spain, a region known as Galicia, that relies heavily in agriculture and has a population density higher than the rest of Spain.  For many decades Galicia -similarly to Ireland- has suffered for several decades an emigration epidemic.  Irish went to England, and then they moved by the thousands to America when they suffered  the "potato crisis".  Similarly, Galicians ("Gallegos") went looking for work to Catalunya (region on the NE part of Spain), to Castille (where Madrid is), to the Basque country (Bilbao, where Spain's center of heavy industry resides), and during -and after- the Spanish Civil War (1936-39) they left for Latin America.  There are tens of thousands of Galicians in every major city in that continent.  As a matter of fact there are so many Galicians in Latin America that when they refer to Spaniards they call them "Gallegos".  Because, although we represent 25% of the population of Spain we are 90% of all the Emigrants who left the Iberia peninsula.

I am in my heart very appreciative to Latin America, and I would love to return the favor to them as much as I humbly could.  Because, when things were tough in Spain, we had an "escape valve" to our social problems: EMIGRATION.  It was a sad solution, but it was a solution, otherwise many of my country folk would have perished, or suffered severe famine.  Instead, most of relatives and other compatriots prospered in Latin America, a few returned rich to Galicia, others settled for good in Caracas, Sao Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Santiago de Chile, Montevideo, Asuncion, Mexico City, San Juan, Havana, Bogotá, ... where they -and their children- became proud nationals of  those countries. 

What is the point the story?  I left Spain because of love, I got married to an American citizen.  So, my story is somewhat different to the typical Immigrant tale.   However, most of my uncles and relatives are spread throughout Latin America.  Many of whom I never had a chance to meet.

The story of an immigrant who has to abandon his country, his culture, his relatives, and move to a different country is always sad.  It is even sadder if he arrives in a country with a radically different culture and national language.

  It is for that reason, that I am compassionate with Immigrants.  And I hate to see them being abused.  As far as I am concerned, who abuses them could be as well be demeaning my uncles, and many of my relatives who are scattered throughout Latin America.

I firmly believe that "controlled" immigration is good to almost any country these days.  But I would prefer helping those countries, rather than taking their poor nationals (or their best educated people, which is the case of the H-1B visas).  I am a witness to the fact that deep within the heart of every Immigrant there is a very sad story.

In the photo above, Haitians in their capital (Port au Prince) lining up for visas in front of the US Embassy.

Why do I say "controlled" immigration?   Because if uncontrolled then we have "illegal Immigrants",  and since they have not legal right to be here, we close our eyes to their needs, often we take advantage of them, or we conscientiously ignore their rights, allowing legislation that would treat them as less humans than we are.  Furthermore, we can establish limits that we can check, and quotas that we can absorb.

Be aware, that current labor legislation allows farm hands, and other "guest workers" (Immigrants with menial jobs) not to be protected under the same labor laws that the rest of us are. That is not fair!   

About 91% of all Americans are either Immigrants, or direct descendants of Immigrants, who arrived in this country less than 100 years ago.  So, why do not we treat Immigrants with the same respect and protection we offer to the rest of our citizens?

 I do not want portray an image where it looks as if all Immigrants are often mistreated.  We Americans do not have such a malice.  Of course, most Immigrants see this country as one who welcomes them, gives them an opportunity to become citizens in five years, offers them jobs and opportunity, and often treats them a lot better than they would probably be treated in their country of origin.

The minimum wage standards, should be just that :  MINIMUM, no matter who the human is!

No laws should allow to pay less than that MINIMUM.

When clicking a button takes you to my other political website ("progress of campaign" at  www.Xuna.com  , please remember to come back to www.Gr8St8.com  by clicking the "page back" button of your browser. Thanks!

 

Proofreader
 
New Address: Stuart, FL 34997  Phn: (772) 324-1123  Fax:(561) 210-1370,  Email: Xuna@MSN.com  

"LEGACY WEBSITE": Will remain unaltered for foreseeable future.